DISTRICT ADDRESS

GMP Trends Inc.
P.O. Box 8001
Boulder, Colorado 80306

DATE OF ISSUE

Introductory

C.I. ISSUE

Issue # MMXIX

NAME AND TITLE OF INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM REPORT ISSUED

To: Responsible Person, Director of Quality Assurance

FIRM NAME

Pharmaceutical and Related Industries

STREET ADDRESS

5600 Regulation Lane

CITY, STATE AND COUNTRY

United States of America and Worldwide

TYPE OF ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTED

Pharmaceutical and Related Industries

During a review of inspection reports of U.S. firms (i) (we) observed:

EDITED EXCERPTS FROM ACTUAL 483 OBSERVATION REPORTS
BY FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION INVESTIGATORS

Manufacturing-Sterile Product Controls

  1. .....Adequate exhaust systems or other systems to control contaminants are lacking in areas where air contamination occurs during production.

    Specifically, SOP ....., Airflow Pattern Visualization Studies. The smoke study videos’ document airflow patterns of various work surfaces. However, the smoke studies do not completely document all of the dynamic operations that commonly occur during routine filling operations. For example, the Validation/Quality Department has performed an airflow evaluation for manufacturing room ..... that is used for the vial capping operations. However, a similar airflow evaluation has not been performed for manufacturing room ....., which is the area that is used to perform the manual aseptic connections of the sterile solution to the fill equipment in aseptic fill suite .....

  2. .....There is a failure to thoroughly review any unexplained discrepancy whether or not the batch has been already distributed.

    Specifically,

    1. In support of the aseptic process, the Drug Master File (DMF .....) establishes ..... media fill specifications. However, in regard to media fill batches, there are no records to document the assignable cause for the rejection of media filled bottles, which precludes the Quality Unit from confirming that the media fills met the acceptance criteria.
    2. The Environmental Monitoring (EM) Trend data, documents the percent of microbial identification for Gram Positive Bacillus species, from the EM sampling for the manufacturing facility. The EM sampling identifies the locations where the microbial contaminants were recovered. However, the evaluations fail to identify the source(s) of the microbial contaminants. For example, the root cause for presence of the Bacillus species contamination. The root cause evaluations(s) in turn assist to address, and ultimately control, the ingress of objectionable microorganisms.
  3. .....Equipment used in the manufacture, processing or holding of drug products is not periodically tested to ensure that functional capabilities are maintained.

    There is no periodic testing of the Sterile Depyrogenation Tunnel to ensure that a Class 100 environment is maintained in the depyrogenation tunnel. The Operational Qualification (OQ) included acceptance criteria performed to ensure that particulate levels meet the requirements for Firm’s Level I (Class 100) conditions. Furthermore, there has been no testing to ensure that the differential pressures are properly maintained between the inlet zone, hot zone and cooling zones. The depyrogenation oven is used to prepare vials for aseptic filling area ..... The depyrogenation tunnel has been used in production since .....

  4. .....Written production and process control procedures are not followed in the execution of production and process control functions.

    Specifically, the “Interrupted Fill Events” SOP ....., established the practice of Change Requests. Three interrupted fills have occurred since the initiation of the Change Requests and establishment of the above mentioned Standard Operating Procedure. However, the Director of Regulatory Affairs confirmed there is no language in the drug application concerning the interrupted fills strategy/option with respect to their process validation. In addition, the interrupted fill practice and the option of interrupting the currently approved aseptic filling process as well as the effect(s) on the process validation submitted in the drug application has not been communicated or submitted to the FDA for review.

SEE REVERSE
OF THIS PAGE
EMPLOYEE(S) SIGNATURE

GMP TRENDS INC.

EMPLOYEE(S) TITLE

Editor

DATE ISSUED

Introductory

FORM GMP VOLUME I SUPPLEMENTS PREVIOUS EDITIONS INSPECTION OBSERVATIONS

GMP TRENDS®, INC. edits and publishes this information dissemination report semi-monthly for quality-minded executives in the pharmaceutical and related industries. Subscription rates: $480 per year; additional copies $240 per year when mailed in the same envelope with regular subscription copy. Add $45 for delivery outside of the USA and Canada. Also available online. For details visit www.gmptrends.com

©2012 GMP TRENDS®, INC. FAX (303) 443-3317, PHONE (303) 443-8716, e-mail: gmp@gmptrends.com, www.gmptrends.com

Contents of GMP TRENDS® are protected by the U.S. Copyright Law. Reproduction of any type is strictly prohibited by law. Authorization to photocopy for internal or personal use is granted by GMP TRENDS ®, INC. when the fee of $5.00 plus $1.00 per copy of each page is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400. The Transactional Reporting Service fee code is: 7023-0780 $5.00 + $1.00.